Silicon Networks


Clients | Internet Services | Local Area Networking |Search Engine Optimization | Training




Lightning Fast
Broadband Products

 

Strategic Planning for Taxation
Marvin Tanner
Silicon Networks USA
July 14, 2006

Abstract

“The crime of taxation is not in the taking it, it’s in the way it’s spent.”  Will Rodgers (1879-1935, http://en.thinkexist.com).  A properly defined corporate structure will not endure the embarrassment of the tax levy.

Strategic Planning for Taxation

A properly structured corporation decreases tax liabilities and increases cash flow.

Several forms of corporate structures are available to corporations; Schedule C Corporation, Sub Chapter S Corporation, and Limited Liability Corporation.

James R. Hines of the University of Michigan in Corporate Taxation, “corporate tax obligations consist chiefly of fractions of corporate income.”  Hines goes on to state: “The taxation of corporate income encourages entrepreneurs and managers to structure and conduct their business operations in ways designed to avoid taxes.”  Equity financing when replaced be debt financing has the effect of reducing potential tax liabilities.

Hines suggests that US corporate policy affects business decision making  by “discouraging  the incorporation of profitable businesses that can be organized in noncorporate form.  In the United States, business organization whose income is not subject to corporate income taxes include small (“S”) corporations, partnership, sole proprietorships, and limited liability companies (p6).

Creation of the limited liability company offers corporate shield protection and the opportunity to pass members income as regular income, avoiding the double taxation associated with “C Corporations.”

Firms seeking in reducing tax liabilities should evaluate current budgets for spending patterns; leasing real estate offers monthly deductions fully deducible.  

Investing in real estate for leasing to other organizations offers substantial deductions.  Municipal mutual funds offers market rates with shielded income.

Hines points out “taxation influences the timing, magnitude, and composition of corporate investment in plant and equipment, inventories, research, and development, and other business assets.

Hines continues on with a notation from Krzyzaniak and Musgrave that corporate taxation increases the cost of corporate output and increases transfers to the nonprofit sector through taxation.  The article continues with “if the corporate sector of the economy has a lower/capital ratio than the noncoporate sectors of the economy, then the introduction of a corporate tax shifts  resources into the noncoporate sector and thereby raises the demand for capital.

This discourse allows the corporate capital model to focus on tuning the corporate budget to optimize deductions.     Optimal deductions are those that indirectly generate income in future periods, or defer income until future periods.

Leasing plant and facilities is a deductible expense in the current period.    This reduces taxable income, but does not assist in building assets.    An alternative to leasing is the purchase of assets that appreciate such as office buildings and other real estate. 

Commercial real estate offers deductions for interest and depreciation, shielding tax liabilities for future periods. 

A C Corporation has double taxation, as when founders disinvest, in general it is considered as regular income.   A Limited Liability Company has the ability to pass members investment or gains and accounted for as ordinary income on the IRS 1040 return.

A properly structured company can reduce tax liability, and one structure allows maximum return on founder’s initial investment. Instead of issuing stock certificates for the initial investment, it is prudent for the founders to loan the new corporation capital at market rate.

This structure allows the corporation to repay the loan to the founders with interest, which is not regular income.   With the proper structure, the founders can avoid double taxation, increase capital realization, and reduce tax consequences. 

-----------------------------------------------------------

  Bibliography

Auebach, Alan J 2001.   Taxation and corporate financial policy, Handbook of public economics, vol. 3.  North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Hall, Robert E. and Dale W. Jorgenson.  1967.  Tax policy and investment behavior.   American Economic Review 57: 391-414.

Hines, James R. Jr, 1999.   Lessons from behavioral responses to international taxation.  National Tax Journal 52: 305-322.

Hines, James R. Jr, 2001.   Corporate Taxation.  University of Michigan.

about us    |   career opportunities  |  contact us  |    legal   |   press releases  |  privacy

Linux Technical Training

Site Map